> The switch in sparse_8 could be simplified by dividing x by eight before the jump. Interestingly, gcc doesn't find this simplification.
It could not because that would ensure that 7 values for each case would be handled by function calls instead of the default case - 0/8 is 0, but 3/8 is also 0
It could not because that would ensure that 7 values for each case would be handled by function calls instead of the default case - 0/8 is 0, but 3/8 is also 0