18 comments

  • akudha 4 minutes ago
    Why do car manufacturers brag about hitting 60 mph in 1, 2 or whatever seconds? For a normal person, does this really matter - what is the big deal if a car hits 60 mph in 5 seconds instead of 1? There are more important things like safety, repairability, longevity etc right?
    • weird-eye-issue 0 minutes ago
      It's just one stat and it makes for a good headline. Obviously those other things are important but they don't exactly fit into a headline. Why is that so confusing?
    • FrustratedMonky 1 minute ago
      Bruh. Chicks man. Chicks dig fast cars.
  • lgl 26 minutes ago
    Tesla Roadster vaporware edition MK2: now with actual vapor!
  • m000 1 minute ago
    With such a powerful suction system, I can see this replacing street-sweeping trucks in a few years.
  • romaaeterna 38 minutes ago
    Amazing tech demo. I would have liked to see more discussion of the cold-gas thrusters in the earlier Hacker News article. Some people seemed confused and made claims that the demo was a separate "rocket" version that used a combustion technology.
    • sandworm101 22 minutes ago
      Cold gas or not, these are still rocket motors.
      • TheOtherHobbes 4 minutes ago
        It takes genius to take rocket motors and cover them in cringe.
  • low_tech_punk 2 minutes ago
    EPA won't like the gas emission
    • CarVac 1 minute ago
      It's compressed air.
  • mittensc 54 minutes ago
    is it me or does it just look ugly?, was expecting the original roadster looks...
    • kec 3 minutes ago
      The original roadster was a Lotus Elise, all Tesla did was swap in an electric drivetrain.

      Tesla has never really shown they can design anything compelling that doesn’t look like a lumpy shoe.

    • causesothere 12 minutes ago
      Tesla has been in the business of ugly cars for some time.
  • ivanjermakov 26 minutes ago
    Original roadster is one of the best looking car designs for my taste. This... subdivision modifier over the Cybertruck.
    • selectodude 3 minutes ago
      Makes sense, it was a Lotus Elise.
  • Arainach 14 minutes ago
    > An invite-only "Rocket" variant is a single-seat model with a "full flight system."

    Tesla should be sued into oblivion over "full self driving", but after that, if you believe this nonsense and buy one that's on you.

  • oniony 58 minutes ago
    All they were missing was the shark.
  • darkspine 1 hour ago
  • zen_kernal 13 minutes ago
    Totally thought this was AI when I first saw this.
  • hawaiijoe 6 minutes ago
    Greatest American company run by an African American ever.
  • jansan 22 minutes ago
    It is not a roadster. A roadster is defined as an open-air, two-seat convertible.

    This one is a hard-top super-coupe and I recommend calling it the "Cyberwedge"

  • kakacik 15 minutes ago
    I dont see actual landing part, even drone for some reason flew away, very convenient. Unless its super smooth (which it doesnt seem to be), one can expect progressive damage on these heavy cars.

    Marketing stunt is nice, I care more about consistent nazi behavior of the owner.

  • tokarf 1 hour ago
    lame
  • shadowtree 0 minutes ago
    Can we get the original Dropbox hater guy to comment here too?

    What has HN become - just endless anti-tech hate, downstream from idiotic TikTok politics.

    Is it the moderation system that amplifies this nonsense here?

    If those cold-air thrusters are getting commoditized, the real discussion here should be around what could be built around them. How to HACK them.

    Reddit exists for this other nonsense pile on.

  • sdcfgy 28 minutes ago
    Tasteless crap.
  • pluc 2 hours ago
    Awesome, another technology we want to implement before we have the infrastructure to support it.
    • harlequinetcie 38 minutes ago
      Exactly this... Which city will allow for a car they cannot chase with a patrol?

      It would have been much better if it was a skateboard, tbh.