10 comments

  • cypherpunks01 50 minutes ago
    Unqualified use of the word "predicts" is a little bit of a stretch in this editorialized title.

    The study doesn't predict suicide attempts out of some type of biometric or otherwise observable data or surveillance information, it's predicting it from a self-survey. The actual journal article title tells the story much better:

    "Using smartphone surveys to predict next-week suicide attempts"

    https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fabn0001117

    • mlazos 2 minutes ago
      I don’t think you realize how often depressed people say they will but don’t commit suicide, and also being able to know when is quite remarkable - I think this study is pretty interesting, and not as obvious as you think it is.
    • loeg 38 minutes ago
      Also, "most." Presumably most attempters were not participating in the study's surveys, so it would be impossible for the study to predict for them.
      • gdhkgdhkvff 19 minutes ago
        I mean, sure. Things can be wrong if you intentionally misunderstand words to mean something that they weren’t intended to mean. Is there anyone that legitimately thought that “most” here meant “majority of all actual attempts”?
        • andsoitis 8 minutes ago
          > Is there anyone that legitimately thought that “most” here meant “majority of all actual attempts”?

          What does “most” mean in the story?

          • john_strinlai 4 minutes ago
            it's in the third paragraph of the link
    • daishi55 42 minutes ago
      Uh, sounds like a prediction to me? It’s not “not a prediction” just because the prediction is not made on a certain type of data.
      • cypherpunks01 34 minutes ago
        Oh it is a scientific prediction for sure.

        I am just saying that if a layperson were told, "I have invented a machine that can accurately predict when someone is going to do Z!", but then, while researching the technology behind how such a prediction is possible, turns out the machine simply has been repeatedly asking the person how likely it is they will be doing Z, how much they think about Z, etc, then the layperson may feel a bit misled by the initial claim. I feel that way towards the editor that wrote this article title.

        • beepbooptheory 26 minutes ago
          What is a better term or qualification they could have used?
      • dsecurity49 32 minutes ago
        If you don't have accurate/complete data, then how can the prediction be accurate?
        • rrr_oh_man 21 minutes ago
          Data is rarely accurate or complete when it touches human beings
          • pixl97 16 minutes ago
            Yea, but at least it's sensible data and not random noise. The whole "Please don't commit scientific fraud" should apply first.
  • cobertos 53 minutes ago
    Was very curious on what was meant by the following:

    > The study included a real-time alert system for intervening if a person indicated a high suicidal intent

    Because it sounds a bit dystopian.

    And found a little more about it[0]

    > For example, in our monitoring studies, we install smartphone apps on participants’ phones. These participants are often recruited from hospitals after presenting with high suicide risk. We tell them explicitly that we monitor responses during certain hours—for example, between 9 a.m. and 9 p.m.—and that we will do our best to respond if we believe they are at imminent risk of harming themselves.

    ...

    > We have real-time alerts when someone crosses a predefined risk threshold, and we follow a very detailed protocol that specifies exactly what actions we take at each level of risk. But we want participants to understand that this is not a replacement for clinical care. We are not a “Minority Report” system that will swoop in and prevent harm in every case.

    [0]: https://primr.org/ethical-challenges-in-suicide-research/

    • ComputerGuru 48 minutes ago
      It’s very much an embodiment of the law that says to monitor a system is to interfere with it; it would be very hard to say they “predicted” general suicide attempts vs they set up a scenario that allowed them to nudge people into such actions given everything.
      • TZubiri 12 minutes ago
        That would be the observer effect

        en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observer_effect_(physics)

        and a more specific form from psychology

        en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawthorne_effect

  • danek_szy 52 minutes ago
    The article mentions sensitivity, but I’m also curious about this method’s specificity too…
    • burpingtree 29 minutes ago
      Yes it sounds like people came in at high risk of suicide and then they gave them an app that surveyed them and would predict they were going to commit suicide. Given they were at high risk for suicide attempts, how does this compare to just predicting the people would always try to commit suicide in the following week?
    • zvikara 14 minutes ago
      I also wonder if having to answer this daily annoying survey a actually make you more wanting to kill yourself...
  • sillysaurusx 30 minutes ago
    > 90 percent of people who survived a suicide attempt reported that they had been feeling an urge to alleviate psychological agitation and pain that turned out to be temporal — like “being in a burning room” or wanting to “shut everything off for a couple of days,” Nock said.

    I moved to Austin last week, away from my wife and 3yo daughter. It’s been torture. Today was the first time I could FaceTime with her without completely breaking down crying.

    One annoying part about suicide is that if you reveal to anyone that you want to stop living, they usually treat you like a big risk, or think you’re insane, or worry you might hurt them, or be uncomfortable to be around you anymore.

    Someone at a party was going through my key chain. “Mail key?” “Nope, gun key if I decide to blow my brains out.” That was basically the last time I talked to them.

    For a datapoint of n=1, my biggest factor motivating me to do it is the constant pain. It permeates your whole chest, all day, every day.

    I’ve been fortunate to make some friends here. But really, I just don’t want to continue living. In a way, it feels like being in a cult — everyone around me thinks life is so great, and that it’s so horrible if I cut it short. But cutting it short has so many benefits. No more job. No more boss. No more missing my family. No need to rebuild my life after 20 years.

    Like, truly, other than seeing my daughter again, I don’t have a reason to keep going. Playing games is fun, meeting people is nice… but I’m alone in a 700sqft apartment with some cereal and Dino nuggets, fantasizing about playing tag with my daughter, and being incredibly jealous that the man who replaced me gets to experience “my” family life every day.

    Suicide is appealing because life is hard. It’s so much effort. I just wish people wouldn’t cut me out for admitting it’s appealing, or try to force me into a hospital. I just want to be heard, not “helped.”

    These studies presume that suicide is treatable, and that it’s a “thing” that can be “fixed”. But it often isn’t. You want to rebuild my life for me and go to work every day? I’d give anything to be on autopilot in my own head, and just be asleep.

    I’m doing a little better. It’s just really hard, you know? I wish I could say “hey, I’ve had a good life. I’ve done a bunch of cool things. I’d like to call it quits please” without it being sacrilege.

    Anyway. I wish all of you a great night. Hug your kids or your SO for me.

    • metalcrow 22 minutes ago
      Yeah, that's the truth. Identifying someone is suicidal really kinda means very little. What are they going to do, lock you in a room and take away the little freedom you have to choose? Sure, that's helpful. Gonna be extra great when they eventually let you out and you don't have a house or job to go back to.

      And helping someone who is suicidal improve their life is such an enormous hardship that the little we currently offer to help with it (therapy) is so weak it's insane. No, talking to this person for 30 minutes and telling me little mental tricks to deal with things isn't going to save me. Pills do better but still are pretty weak.

      Truth is, the real solution is to FIX THE PROBLEM. Society should help suicidal people by addressing the life crisis that causes them to be suicidal. Anything short of that is either worthless or requires a full time live-in caretaker.

    • rukuu001 14 minutes ago
      Hey sorry to hear about this. I see a lot of your comments and enjoy them.

      I didn't understand any of this until I had a relationship with someone that had suicidal thoughts from time to time.

      This echoes much of what she described - constant pain is hard, and suicide offers immediate relief.

      It's an experience of reality that's very hard to understand for anyone who hasn't been close to it.

      @sillysaurusx thank you for sharing your experience so clearly. Best of luck

    • sailfast 18 minutes ago
      I hear you, and I've been in similar places.

      I don't know you, but I would encourage you talk to a professional about these thoughts as soon as possible. This isn't a judgment, not trying to cut you out - it's just been helpful to me personally. Therapy is really just one more person to hear you, commiserate, and help process life being as hard as it is.

    • sigmaml 11 minutes ago
      Hello Shawn!

      I have been "hear"ing people out, without trying to "help", for over two decades.

      In case you wish to talk to me, please mail me: Gmail sigma.ml.

    • bergxo 19 minutes ago
      Life is hard and I’m sorry you’re going through this. <3 Have you tried talking to someone professionally?
    • beedeebeedee 21 minutes ago
      If you’re feeling down, go listen to music on Sixth Street, head to New Orleans or camp out at Enchanted Rock
    • hijjert6 17 minutes ago
      [flagged]
  • netfortius 1 hour ago
    Harvard study authors never read Emil Cioran.
    • Viability1936 41 minutes ago
      Why do you say that - are you referencing something specific or just a point about his framing of existence? I just finished "a short history of decay"
      • netfortius 35 minutes ago
        Cioran claimed to have been able to avoid killing himself by fully embracing the idea of suicide.
        • gowld 5 minutes ago
          Cioran was a pessimist and a nihilist (and a blowhard) and interested in the idea of suicide, but never suicidal in the first place.
    • cottsak 37 minutes ago
      I'd like to understand this quip better as well
  • hirvi74 39 minutes ago
    I'm curious what actions the app takes once a sufficient risk has been determined? Does the app or people managing the service just send paramilitary police units to SWAT people or what?

    I really don't see how this much different than something like calling/texting 988.

  • Pannoniae 24 minutes ago
    "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair
  • awesome_dude 21 minutes ago
    Alternative headline: participating in Harvard study found to have disturbing effects after one week
  • fr2029 58 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • andsoitis 48 minutes ago
    > real-time alert system for intervening if a person indicated a high suicidal intent

    Suicide is a right.

    • scronkfinkle 22 minutes ago
      That is incredibly dismissive to people undergoing something that is causing them to temporarily have these thoughts and need intervention
      • andsoitis 13 minutes ago
        > and need intervention

        How can you know in advance that someone needs intervention? By what standard?

    • hijjert6 16 minutes ago
      [flagged]