IBM Bob

(bob.ibm.com)

63 points | by artpar 1 hour ago

36 comments

  • mrbluecoat 39 minutes ago
    Totally reminds me of "HP Offers 'That Cloud Thing Everyone Is Talking About'"

    https://youtube.com/watch?v=9ntPxdWAWq8

    • dyzone 22 minutes ago
      How you doing fellow kids?
    • joleyj 29 minutes ago
      1000
  • psygn89 4 minutes ago
    Is Bib Bob's partner?

    https://imgur.com/a/3PQXIsQ

  • Ciantic 38 minutes ago
    This sounds a lot like Spotify's XIRP. They managed to vibe something useful for their own engineers, were super hyped, and decided to release it in public. However what are the odds this harness will stand the test of time against actual harness makers like OpenAI or Anthropic? Neither Spotify or IBM are focused on making models or harnesses, these are just side-products.
    • qsort 15 minutes ago
      To be fair Codex and Claude Code don't have a lot of secret sauce either. This is not to say that the harness doesn't matter at all or that you can't do any better, but whenever they benchmark it always turns out that you don't lose that much with even a very minimal agent. If a different harness makes better sense for your workflow I don't see why you wouldn't switch (or make your own if you have the resources to do so).

      I'm also sticking to first-party agents, but that's more because I feel no compelling reason to switch and CLI agents fit well with my spartan technology choices. YMMV.

  • cisrockandroll 16 minutes ago
    Is this just a harness or using a proprietary model in the background? Anthropic and OpenAI are already very well trained in IBM system i and z knowledge. Unless Bob is somehow improving the integration to these midrange and mainframe systems I literally dont see any benefit to using Bob. IBM will just kill this proprietary tech in 5 years as they are currently doing with RDi or forget about updating it like SEU.
  • a012 50 minutes ago
    Nobody got fired for using IBM Bob
    • glitchc 5 minutes ago
      Can we say it's Bob's fault, though? Bob did it, not me.
    • someguyiguess 25 minutes ago
      Pretty sure a lot of people got fired over Microsoft Bob though
      • hn_throw2025 19 minutes ago
        Well, you could say Melinda got a big promotion for a while.
    • pestatije 12 minutes ago
      Nobody who got fired uses IBM Bob
  • Stevvo 37 minutes ago
    Interesting they are renting out agent skills. You can pick up "Java Modernization" at $20 a month for "Specialist workflows to help with modernizing Java applications", or "IBM i" for "Specialist modes, workflows, and skills to work with IBM i applications".
    • qsort 22 minutes ago
      markdown as a service is crazy
      • closetheloopdev 15 minutes ago
        I lol'd so hard at this comment that it hurt.
    • getatme32 19 minutes ago
      IBM hasn't made a product that works since Db2 so I am fairly confident this is a flaming pile of garbage.
  • sajithdilshan 32 minutes ago
    I'm really confused what this is, is it a harness or a new model by IBM? Some reviews on that page suggests that it's a new model
  • bob1029 39 minutes ago
    I like how the solitary review is word salad.
  • brk 58 minutes ago
    This can only mean that IBM Clippy is next.
  • selfawareMammal 19 minutes ago
    The logo, the name... Horrible marketing/branding.
  • woggy 9 minutes ago
    Bobcoins. Hehe.
  • pram 8 minutes ago
    I thought the image was a joke, but you really pay with Bobcoins.. lmao

    https://bob.ibm.com/pricing

  • swiftcoder 24 minutes ago
    At least it's not Clippy?
    • r2ob 20 minutes ago
      At least it's not Clippy(2)
  • m_w_ 32 minutes ago
    The review that "IBM Bob isn't just another autocomplete tool" tells you everything you need to know about this product. lol.
  • skhameneh 25 minutes ago
    I’m quite certain it’s a fork of Roo Code which is a fork of Cline.

    When I saw earlier reviews and videos of it, I couldn’t shake the ick of IBM shamelessly forking a startup’s code. There was even some UI slop where they had some big green pulsing button.

    That combined with knowing full well how inefficient the default Roo Code base prompts were, I would not be surprised if there’s some massive token churn.

  • DeathArrow 32 minutes ago
    31 years after Microsoft Bob, IBM releases it's own IBM Bob. :)
    • someguyiguess 25 minutes ago
      It's like they're begging for failure
    • ginko 15 minutes ago
      Call it PC Bob
  • xyst 10 minutes ago
    ibm desperately clinging to relevancy by hopping on the LLM bandwagon.
  • saberience 47 minutes ago
    This is embarrassing. It would have been better to release nothing than this.
  • antonvs 50 minutes ago
    Should have been IBM Tom, after legendary IBM CEO Thomas J. Watson. But perhaps they didn't want to sully his name.
  • quietsegfault 1 hour ago
    I used Bob extensively at an IBM acquisition, it was absolutely dreadful. Bobcoins.
  • h_mirin 33 minutes ago
    Bobalytics
  • taspeotis 29 minutes ago
    Not to shit on their effort or anything, but it looks like a VS Code fork + an agent panel which is very ... late 2024 energy?
  • walrus01 37 minutes ago
    Not to be confused with Microsoft Bob:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Bob

  • yapyap 6 minutes ago
    ibm bob, will help you make slop
  • znpy 45 minutes ago
    Lost opportunity to call it Hal
  • Geonode 1 hour ago
    I bet this will be as successful as Microsoft Bob.
    • dmd 1 hour ago
      My guess is absolutely nobody on the team that made this is even old enough to remember Microsoft Bob.
  • self_awareness 24 minutes ago
    Oh, so we are yet again in the 'Bob' phase?

    Maybe this time it'll work.

  • varispeed 31 minutes ago
    The companies who are hoarding RAM to produce pointless products should be called out. Deprive working class from computing resources to sell some corporate crap. Get fucked.
  • rdtsc 3 minutes ago
    [flagged]
  • gilliethefoil 3 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • jrflo 16 minutes ago
    [flagged]
  • colesantiago 1 hour ago
    I never thought the day that IBM would make complete slop.

    But it is IBM after all.

    • lirolero 1 hour ago
      > But it is IBM after all.

      Then how did you not see that coming?

      • zenethian 58 minutes ago
        “I would expect something like this from IBM, but I never expected it from IBM!”