9 comments

  • noinsight 2 hours ago
    The drives to read them (Blu-rays) will be the problem. Pioneer stopped manufacturing them in 2024, only LG drives are available now.

    Coincidentally I just bought one, they’ve doubled in price now recently.

    Also bought some M-Discs to try. They’re half the price in Japan (Amazon) compared to Germany.

    • QuantumNomad_ 1 hour ago
      In a 1000 years even if they don’t have the drives, as long as they still know roughly how it works maybe they will photograph it with a microscope and read the tracks in the M-Disc from that. Then they will have to decode it also of course.
      • bluGill 52 minutes ago
        Maybe. The question is why are we needing to read these disks in a thousand years. I would guess right now that the most likely case is information we care about is archived on modern formats such as hard drives, which are constantly being copied to different drives as the old ones go out and so in a thousand years they'll still have all the data in a much more accessible format than a very obsolete disk.

        If, instead, we are talking about some human disaster and, that constant copies is lost at some point, we're kind of stuck. I don't think the technology to read those disks will exist either, even though in theory, yes, that could be done. It would be a massive reverse engineering effort and I don't think they will even know to start doing that with these weird disks that the agents had.

        If you want something archived for a thousand years, well, we know that clay tablets baked worked, although we sometimes can't read the letters but at least seeing something with the eyes says there's something and if there's enough of them we have decoded language.

        The best archival paper in ideal conditions lasts more than a thousand years, but in more typical storage, we can't store paper that long. Paper has only been stored successfully in Egypt for that long. I'm sure there are other deserts though that would count just as well.

        • vkaku 34 minutes ago
          Issue with storage is you need shelf stability without ongoing electrical/mechanical work refreshing data time to time. Masked ROMs and M-Discs are those two things which can really last a very long time; Floppies, Hard Disks, Solid State Storage and present day ROMs all require periodic costs, efforts and refreshes to keep them going (that means they can't be kept in storage and then re-opened in 30 years).

          We also need a mechanism that outlasts that archival lifespan so how to read Discs or Masked ROMs and how to interpret them, also needs to be stored as well. Repairing electronics is a valuable skill that needs to be passed on across generations as well.

          Keeping humans around seems to be the best bet, given how things are going, I wouldn't count on the present set of beings around to preserve any of this information that well either.

        • Wowfunhappy 19 minutes ago
          I think 1,000 years maybe doesn't matter that much. However, these predictions are imperfect. If they're aiming for 1,000 years, that makes me more confident the disc will be readable in 100 years, which may matter more.
  • msephton 1 hour ago
    I have a few of these drives. They also rip discs very accurately. Bit-identical to my Plextor, at a fraction of the price. But sadly no ripping software offers these the verification logging that is required for redump approval.
  • tim-- 1 hour ago
    > Verbatim Japan claims that M-DISCs now use a titanium layer to prevent moisture ingression and to provide environmental stability

    From what I understand, Verbatim no longer manufactures true M-DISC media. https://www.reddit.com/r/DataHoarder/comments/1i0ky6v/what_h...

    It's all just MABL now.

  • numpad0 1 hour ago
    I wonder why every types of discs seem to be entering a de facto deprecated state over the last ~10 years, especially inorganic types are. Is it simply because everyone's on Netflix? Or could it be environmental/material cost issues?

    I believe these discs are made by transferring materials by vaporizing them in a series of big vacuum chambers, maybe those materials are toxic and/or China dominated and nobody wants to deal with them anymore?

    • Avamander 1 hour ago
      There's just no mass-market appeal?

      Large storage hyperscalers or whatever just use tape?

      I can't wait for tape patents to expire.

  • sehw 1 hour ago
    I bought 3 burners and burn 2x copies of every 100GB disc. Only Verbatim burners seem to not fail with 50+Gb discs. By the way!
  • tambourine_man 49 minutes ago
    Every few years or so I flirt with the idea of backing up to M-Disks. Then I remember how slow and low density they are.

    For recording and forgetting, I recently played with LTO, again.

    But I always end up at local HDD + remote AWS Glacier.

    • comboy 5 minutes ago
      Went through m-disks phase, too small to me, got some used LTO-6 and after going through the pain of having a working controller for it somewhere I'm pretty happy.

      Cloud is more rational, but.. it's gated by some company. Which can arbitrarily cut you off. It should not be a problem with a proper setup, but it's nice to have a thing that you can hold that holds your data and you can put anywhere you want.

      With LTO though it requires physical action to do the backup, with Glacier I'm assuming you can configure it some way that you don't have to worry about machine doing the backup being compromised.

    • bob1029 29 minutes ago
      AWS Glacier is mostly just LTO done for you with exponentially less risk.
      • nxobject 14 minutes ago
        I’m sad they’re retiring Snowball soon, though.
  • 1970-01-01 46 minutes ago
    This is the only storage media I trust to outlive me. Everything else, including paper, will degrade.
  • splix 1 hour ago
    Even the largest 100GB disk seems too small nowadays
  • hulitu 3 days ago
    > M-DISC – DVD/Blu-ray compatible discs

    citation needed. My DVD/Blu-ray writer does not support M-DISC

    > may last up to 1000 years

    or may not. Who knows ?

    • ricardobeat 2 hours ago
      The discs are entirely compliant with the Blu-Ray spec, there is no “compatibility” mark; anything made in the past 10-15 years should work fine. Your writer may be out of spec?

      Apparently original M-Disc DVDs required a more powerful laser than normal, but that is not the case for Blu-Ray.

      • ButlerianJihad 11 minutes ago
        There is licensing and a compatibility mark, and I distinctly recall that my Philips BD-XL writer was badged for M-DISC and touted its capabilities.

        https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/threads/new-m-disc-to-pro...

        I ran Linux backups on BD-XL 100GB discs for awhile. I lacked access to space in a salt mine, and the M-DISC media was prohibitively expensive, and unnecessary, since the Linux system, its drives, and its backups have all gone away by now. And nothing of value was lost.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-DISC#History

          As of the 2020s, there are only 2 licensed manufacturers of M-Discs: Ritek, sold under the Ritek and RiDATA brands, and Verbatim with co-branded discs, marketed as the "Verbatim M-DISC".[14][15]
    • buckle8017 1 hour ago
      Confusingly you need an MDISC writer for some but not all disks.

      Any bluray reader will work to read tho.