Windows brings out the Rorschach test in everyone

(devblogs.microsoft.com)

156 points | by luu 3 hours ago

30 comments

  • srvmshr 1 hour ago
    Raymond Chen's articles are the true wealth of contemporary tech-lore. My favorite is the one where a user reported error on Flight Simulator map [0] and it escalated all the way up to Bill Gates & the then chief of FS division.

    [0] https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20170418-00/?p=95...

  • stefs 1 hour ago
    years ago my father got a decomissioned, wiped clean notebook from work and asked me to set it up for him. i didn't want to shell out a hundred bucks for windows, so i suggested trying linux (ubuntu) and he agreed. "intrepid ibex" was installed without issues. a few weeks later i asked him if everything was ok and how he liked it, and he had no complaints, except one: he didn't like the edgy skull on the desktop wallpaper: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_version_history#/media/...
    • st_goliath 1 hour ago
      > "intrepid ibex" ... edgy skull on the desktop wallpaper

      Ah, that would be 8.10 with the coffee stain wallpaper :-P

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ubuntu_screenshot.png

    • bluedino 1 hour ago
      One of the earlier releases (when they would send you free CD's) got flack for people in their underwear

      https://www.zdnet.com/article/canonical-turns-20-shaping-the...

      • Jenk 1 hour ago
        Well, the Ubuntu logo has suddenly clicked. How did I not see it before?!
      • DonHopkins 6 minutes ago
        I'll see your CD cover with three people in their underwear, plus a hologram of the top half of a possibly naked baby on the Microsoft Windows box, and raise you the top half of several naked SGI "Skinny Hackers" in a projected texture map illustration of an ACM publication:

        "Fast Shadows and Lighting Effects Using Texture Mapping", by Mark Segal, Carl Korobkin, Rolf van Widenfelt, Jim Foran, Paul Haeberli, Silicon Graphics Computer Systems. Computer Graphics, 26,2, July 1992, Page 252, Figure 3: Simulating a Slide Projector:

        https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34129571

        "Yes, we have a dress code. You have to dress." – Scott McNealy

        On the other hand, down the road at SGI there was a practice called "Skinnyhacking"!

        https://rdtk.net/internet/how-do-you-check-a-computer-s-comp...

        >Snowsinger. November 21, 2020 at 07:48.

        >A truly excellent review of the history of Silicon Graphics. I worked in the Australian Sales office as their 1st engineer in the Asia Pacific region. Was trained in MtView the 1st week the MtView campus opened. The 1st system I worked on was the IRIS 1000 and subsequently all the products from then on till I left in mid-2009 when the Australian Engineering division was shut. A great company with great people who just wanted to engineer the best Graphics experience on the planet until we lost focus and vision of what we did well. Brings to Mind the Skinny Hackers, the Rocktain event, PCP monitoring, CXFS (Clustered File Systems), Failsafe, Diskless boot, Voxel vision, and so many other engineering wins. A great company, great people, & the drive to make a better computing world. Thank you for the memories and documenting the history of a company that did make some huge breakthroughs in Computer Graphics & Computing architecture. Just go ask NVIDIA, Cray and now HP!! Also a shout out to Jim Clark & his team for the vision and determination to bring the Graphics Engine to world, the heart of the IRIS workstation and subsequent graphics systems.

        https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.sgi.misc/c/X50cCoYrU20/...

        >Tom Davis, Mar 22, 1993, 6:06:21 PM, comp.sys.sgi.misc

        >In article <gom...@zola.esd.sgi.com>, ol...@anchor.esd.sgi.com (Dave Olson) writes:

        |> In <112...@bu.edu> j...@bu-pub.bu.edu (Jason Heirtzler) writes:

        |> | Okay, I gotta know. Whom does the phrase "The Skinny Hackers" refer to?

        |> A small group of (fairly skinny ;) ) folks who are also great hackers/developers and mostly long time SGI employees. Among other fruits of their group hackerdom was the original showcase.

        >Being skinny didn't have anything to do with it. Although Showcase was the best known product of the skinnyhackers, the first product was an image of them made from a photo of all three sitting naked at computer terminals, busily hacking. On top of the photo was the international "no" symbol (red circle with a line across it), and underneath, the words "No Skinnyhacking".

        >Note: Skinnyhacking is a dangerous activity, and should only be performed by professionals. Do NOT attempt it at home.

        >If you're interested, you can see the image in the most recent (1992) SIGGRAPH proceedings, in distored form on the back cover, and in non-distored form on page 252.

        >I can't imagine that anyone would want a copy of this image, but I have one in SGI format. (Actually, the secret goal is to have this image overtake the mandrill in popularity.)

        |> I won't speak further to protect their secret identities ;)

        >I will! It was me! Tom Davis! The bald guy in the front! Oh, and the other two are Rocky Rhodes and Scott Carr. Ann Sydeman joined the group a short time later, but unfortunately missed the initial photo session (although there was a subsequent video ...). Paul Haeberli was the photographer.

        [Fortunately I found a pdf of the paper with the image:]

        "Fast Shadows and Lighting Effects Using Texture Mapping", by Mark Segal, Carl Korobkin, Rolf van Widenfelt, Jim Foran, Paul Haeberli, Silicon Graphics Computer Systems. Computer Graphics, 26,2, July 1992, Page 252, Figure 3: Simulating a Slide Projector:

        https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/133994.134071

    • DonHopkins 10 minutes ago
      At least you didn't install BSD!

      https://halfblog.net/2011/12/04/daemon-worship/

      >I just got a call from the owner of a hotel for which we provide hotspot service. She says that a guest spotted the “Powered by FreeBSD” logo at the bottom of the login page, and was offended; the guest was convinced that either we or the hotel management “worshipped the Devil” and refused to stay at the hotel unless the logo was removed. The owner could make no headway by explaining that the besneakered mascot was a cartoon character and was a daemon, not the Devil. And she feared upsetting the guest even more if she said that large portions of the same software are inside every Mac and iPad. The hotel stands to lose more than $1000 if the guest, who had originally planned to stay for a long period, moves out.

      >One of our tech support people also got a call directly from the hotel guest, who claimed that having the logo on the page constituted “abuse.” The guest also claimed to be “losing money” because she wouldn’t use the hotspot if there was a “devil” on the splash page. He didn’t even realize what she was talking about at first…. He couldn’t imagine why on Earth this person was calling him and going on about devils.

      >Attempts at misguided religious censorship notwithstanding, I don’t want to see one of my ISP’s customers lose business. And I’d like to keep a FreeBSD logo on our hotspot page. Is there artwork that doesn’t include horned creatures that might offend the ignorant or superstitious?

      >–Brett Glass

    • teekert 1 hour ago
      Hmm, I also only see a skull
      • boomlinde 35 minutes ago
        It's impossible for me to determine whether it looks like a skull now because my mind was contaminated with the notion that it's a skull before I had a chance to look.
    • sneak 1 hour ago
      https://massgrave.dev/

      Windows has been free since at least VXKC4. Microsoft wouldn’t exist as anything but an Excel vendor today if it were any other way; it’s intentional.

      (Ubuntu was the right choice.)

    • SV_BubbleTime 1 hour ago
      The most shocking thing for me on this was that Ivex was such a shit version of Linux and gave me such trouble I put Linux off for 10 more years after that crap. It was not at all ready for normal people. Night and day different to Linux today.
  • nehal3m 16 minutes ago
    "The original wallpaper for Windows XP was Red Moon Desert, until people claimed that Red Moon Desert looked like a pair of buttocks."

    That's not what 'this looks like ass' means.

  • blkhawk 39 minutes ago
    I find it worrying because being super sensitive to stuff like that is usually red flag that the person is kinda into it - Senators in Bathroom stalls and all that (bonus if you get the reference).

    But I think the person who directly contacted Microsoft about this was probably not the person who noticed it and brought it up on the Government side just the Person who was tasked with communicating about it so its good they remain nameless.

  • mrosenbjerg 2 hours ago
    Raymond Chen is my favorite MS blog writer
  • harshreality 34 minutes ago
    A few people may have complained, but nobody hated Windows because of the baby hologram or the red moon desert background.

    Everyone who hated Windows hated it because win 9x and early xp were terrible. When they weren't crashing, they were often good enough to get the job done and play games, but nobody would accuse anything in the range of win 3.0 to pre-sp2 xp of being remotely well-designed, not even with xp's yoinking of the NT kernel. Yet despite its poor design, Windows managed to become the principle fast food in the OS world, and Microsoft illegally leveraged that OS near-monopoly.

    Who remembers OS/2?

    • ksbd-pls-finish 24 minutes ago
      This does not seem to be related to the article. OP is about red moon and naked baby and clouds. It does not claim that anyone hated windows because of that.

      Usually I wouldn't comment just to point out offtopic, but I think "instant bad thoughts every time windows is mentioned, no matter the context" is another psychological effect caused by Microsoft.

  • jck86 2 hours ago
    Red Moon Desert is now my wallpaper for the rest of the week.

    Looking at it from a distance indeed may raise some brows.

  • eska 28 minutes ago
    The wallpaper in question: https://windowswallpaper.miraheze.org/wiki/Red_moon_desert

    I suppose it looks like buttocks?

    • breakingcups 24 minutes ago
      Interestingly, that page notes:

      According to Microsoft programmer Raymond Chen on his blog The Old New Thing, Red moon desert was originally intended to be Windows XP's default wallpaper, but was allegedly changed due to some testers feeling it resembled a pair of buttocks, leading to O'Rear's other photo Bliss becoming the default wallpaper. While this wallpaper was temporarily set as the default wallpaper during Whistler, this story does not appear to be true; Bliss had already been selected based on extensive research by design manager Rob Girling and his team, and the Luna visual style shares the same color scheme as the wallpaper. It is more likely the wallpaper was set to default as a decoy; the unleaked Lab06 build 2415 predates build 2423, and shows Bliss set as the wallpaper.

  • yreg 2 hours ago
    This article includes the photo of the (clothed) hologram (it's the third image).

    https://hardcoresoftware.learningbyshipping.com/p/038-design...

  • bpavuk 32 minutes ago
    > Windows XP had its own share of complaints. The original wallpaper for Windows XP was Red Moon Desert, until people claimed that Red Moon Desert looked like a pair of buttocks.

    oh thanks, now I cannot unsee it. :)

  • ttyyzz 1 hour ago
    I must say that "But it makes me wonder about the mental state of our beta testers [...]"

    cought me off guard while drinking coffee

    • rackp 47 minutes ago
      It's pretty funny picturing them with deadpan expressions, coming up with stuff like butts and obscene images.
    • wolfi1 1 hour ago
      is the screen still usable?
  • teekert 2 hours ago
    Another example: [0]

    Have to say this never would have occurred to me. There are also examples of US people being offended by scenes considered harmless in other cultures, ie the Totoro bathtub scene [1], search for "family bathing scene".

    I guess if this hologram offended people, there must be some nice stories about Nirvana's Nevermind (1991).

    [0] https://velvetshark.com/ai-company-logos-that-look-like-butt...

    [1] https://uk.movies.yahoo.com/my-neighbour-totoro-10-things-di...

    • walrus01 1 hour ago
      > Sound familiar? It should, because it's also an apt description of... well, you know. A butthole.

      Good news! Cornholio.ai isn't registered by anyone as a domain name, so someone with sufficient motivation and a love for Beavis and Butthead could totally instruct an LLM to make a satirical AI-butthole-logo themed website.

      Bonus points if it has affiliate links to Amazon or other online stores selling TP (for the bunghole, of course).

    • skeaker 2 hours ago
      Hmm. I gotta say I do see these though. Especially Claude...
    • croes 1 hour ago
    • latexr 39 minutes ago
      > There are also examples of US people being offended by scenes considered harmless in other cultures

      I’m not going to be able to find this, but I remember some piece of news having to do with a woman and a photograph of her with naked breasts.

      Someone found examples of how it had been reported in the US and a European country. Both used the same picture and only censored one area: the face in the European country, the breasts in the US.

    • rsynnott 1 hour ago
      I refuse to believe that at this point the AI companies are not doing that deliberately.
      • lopis 1 hour ago
        You can just as well say the logos look like flowers, suns, plasma balls, retinas. If you choose to only see anuses on all of them, that's really on you.
  • docdeek 2 hours ago
    [2003]
    • pizzaiolo 2 hours ago
      That's how far back Windows needs to go to try to elicit some non-negative attention
      • Tallain 1 hour ago
        I mean, Raymond Chen has been writing The Old New Thing consistently for over 20 years. Nearly every single entry is interesting, informative, and illuminating, aimed at every facet of software engineering, old and new, over the decades. He may be part of the final bastion of quality and care for detail at MS, dwindling and faint as it is.

        Windows doesn't need or deserve defending. It's atrocious. But this is a silly comment.

        • navigate8310 1 hour ago
          I don't think OP meant any non-negative reaction towards Raymond but MSFT.
      • abigdog 36 minutes ago
        Win 95, 98, Me were buggy and crashed alot.
  • professor_v 34 minutes ago
    I'm kind of offended they changed them all. At some point you just have to say 'okay this is just complete bullshit' and stand for the things you create. Otherwise everything ends up in this corporate bland soup of nothingness. Of course we know where Microsoft ended up, but I doesn't have to be that way.

    By all means be pragmatic if it's a government complaining, but you don't have to take all crazy feedback at face value.

  • luciana1u 59 minutes ago
    the ubuntu logo is a skull and the windows logo is four little windows and somehow both are accurate descriptions of the people who use them
  • pelagicAustral 1 hour ago
    They should have told them to gtfo and use Slackware then.
  • DonHopkins 27 minutes ago
    The original 1989 SimCity box was a Rorschach test that cost Maxis $50k.

    The cover was a Bakelite toy city simulator appliance with a red MONSTER disaster button, and a stompy T-Rex-looking creature waving over San Francisco on its TV screen.

    Maxis never called it Godzilla on the box or in the game. Reviewers looked at the inkblot and saw Godzilla anyway.

    Original monster cover:

    https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SimHacker/MicropolisCore/m...

    Revised cover after the lawsuit, monster swapped for a tornado (the MONSTER button survived):

    https://raw.githubusercontent.com/SimHacker/MicropolisCore/m...

    In Feb 2024 I emailed Jeff Braun (Maxis co-founder/CEO) and asked what actually happened and how much Maxis had to pay. He wrote back the same day:

    > Maxis was sued by Toho. We never referred to the name Godzilla, our monster on the box cover was a T-Rex looking character, but... a few magazine reviews called the monster, Godzilla. That was all it took. Toho called it "confusion in the marketplace". We paid $50k for Godzilla to go away. In all honesty, Toho liked Maxis, they said $50k was the minimum they take for Godzilla infringement.

    All the box scans are in the Micropolis repo -- high res front, back with the "floods, earthquakes, fires, tornados, meltdowns and monsters" disaster list, side panels, and the platform variants, each with descriptions:

    https://github.com/SimHacker/MicropolisCore/blob/main/docume...

    Full email thread:

    https://github.com/SimHacker/MicropolisCore/blob/main/docume...

    The back of the box kept advertising monsters as a feature the same year the monster got lawyered off the front.

    The function names in the code all refered to it like "MakeMonster()", but admittedly there was a "GOD" symbol in the code used to index the Monster sprite likw "GetSprite(GOD)", but Toho could not have know that, since it was a C preprocessor macro that was compiled away in the binary:

    https://github.com/SimHacker/micropolis/blob/master/micropol...

  • kleiba2 2 hours ago
    The same government should sue all new mothers: how dare they deliver babies into this world completely naked!!!
    • DonHopkins 1 minute ago
      [delayed]
    • reddalo 1 hour ago
      They better not visit Germany, where nudity -- even in some public spaces -- is considered normal! How dare they!!!
      • eru 1 hour ago
        'Some public spaces' is underselling the prevalence of FKK a bit.
        • dgellow 41 minutes ago
          I remember taking a nap in Tiergarten in Berlin, then woke up to find myself surrounded by a group doing naked yoga
  • wartywhoa23 1 hour ago
    > Until we got a complaint from a government (who shall remain nameless for obvious reasons) that was upset with Windows 95 because it depicted naked children.

    How dare you violate the government's exclusive right to naked children!

  • artisinal 1 hour ago
    How do I view the collectors edition Windows XP without Googling “naked baby” ?

    Did this comment already put me on a list?

  • jb1991 2 hours ago
    So what was the government that complained?
  • globular-toast 1 hour ago
    I was watching YouTube the other day and it was talking about Nirvana's Nevermind album, showed the album cover but with a square censoring part of it. In these cases it really is the censor themselves who is debauched. Reminds me of the classic story where Samuel Johnson left out some rude words from his dictionary. He was congratulated for having left them out, to which he is said to have quipped "I congratulate you on being able to look them up!"
  • khazhoux 1 hour ago
    This is why large companies should employ a few pedophiles to run things like this by them first. Long term, much savings.
    • walrus01 1 hour ago
      Or they could outsource it via some kind of API: EaaS (Epstein As A Service)
  • sneak 1 hour ago
    What is an “obscene body part”?

    If this body part is obscene, shouldn’t the author do the moral thing and remove his own?

  • sachahjkl 1 hour ago
    satanic
  • lukasbm 2 hours ago
    Why should the govt remain nameless?
    • ketzu 1 hour ago
      For the same reason they acted on the complaint and changed the hologram. It would be bad for business.

      I also think it would be very impolite to make fun of your clients on the internet for a stupid request while naming them explicitly while doing so.

  • aiandaguy 38 minutes ago
    niceee
  • kjimlau 2 hours ago
    [flagged]
  • Taikhoom10 2 hours ago
    [dead]
  • OuterVale 2 hours ago
    Users scare me.