Ask HN: Which skill do you believe will take the longest to be replaced by AI?

There is a lot of debate whether AI will surpass humans in all economically viable skills (AGI, by one definition). Regardless of whether this will happen, or when, many people already have lost their jobs in part due to the emerging capabilities of AI models, including writing, document analysis, design, art, etc.

This leaves many in a position where they fear they will be next on the chopping block. Many assume physical tasks will take longer since it will take longer to build up, verify and test humanoid robots vs. some virtual AI agent. However, many believe the writing is on the wall either way, and those in domains involving using their hands or bodies will only have a few more years than the formerly employed white-collar class.

Which skills then, or combinations of skills, do you believe will be safest for staying employed and useful if AI continues improving at the rate it has been for the past few years?

4 points | by atleastoptimal 6 hours ago

6 comments

  • gregjor 4 hours ago
    > There is a lot of debate whether AI will surpass humans in all economically viable skills (AGI, by one definition).

    Actually very little debate. We get a lot of unsubstantiated hype from companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Microsoft. So-called AI has barely made a dent in economic activities, and no company makes money from it. Tech journalism repeatedly fails to question the PR narrative (read Ed Zitron).

    > Regardless of whether this will happen, or when, many people already have lost their jobs in part due to the emerging capabilities of AI models…

    Consider the more likely explanation: many companies over-hired a few years ago and have cut jobs. Focus on stock price in an uncertain economy leads to layoffs. Easier to blame AI for layoffs than admitting C-suite management incompetence. Fear of the AI boogeyman gives employers the upper hand in hiring and salary negotiations, and keeps employers in line out of fear.

  • rajkumarsekar 44 minutes ago
    I think the hardest skills for AI to replace will be those that require human trust, emotional intelligence, and real-time physical adaptability.

    For example, Conflict resolution, therapy, and coaching depend on nuance, empathy, and trust.

    Skilled trades like plumbing, electrical work, or HVAC repair, Auto mechanics, Elevator technicians.

    Roles like physical presence plus knowledge Emergency responders (firefighters, EMTs), Disaster relief coordinators.

  • singmj 5 hours ago
    "Key Account Sales" are difficult to replace because these sales experiences are not documented and depend on many factors in the field. They are not used as input for LLM. Therefore, LLM does not have the knowledge of "Key Account Sales", and this skill is very valuable.
  • apothegm 3 hours ago
    Massage. Anything else where literal human touch is part of the value.

    Plumbing.

    Embalming and funeral direction.

    Childrearing, especially of toddlers. Therapy for complex psychological conditions/ones with complications. Anything else that requires strong emotional and interpersonal judgement and the ability to think outside the box.

    Politics/charisma. Influencers. Cult leaders. Anything else involving a cult of personality.

    Stand up comics/improv artists. Nobody’s going to pay to sit in a room with other people and listen to a computer tell jokes.

    World class athletes.

    Top tier salespeople.

    TV news and game show etc hosts.

    Also note that a bunch of these (and other jobs) may vanish if the vast majority of the population is unemployed and only a few handfuls of billionaires can afford to pay anyone for services.

    I’d also note that a lot of jobs will stay safe for much longer than we fear if AI continues to be unable to actually reason and can only handle patterns / extrapolations of patterns it’s already seen.

  • missedthecue 5 hours ago
    Aside from helping with the administrative part of the work like drafting docs or formatting excel files, it's hard to imagine an LLM that does a salesman's job better than a person, specifically regarding the sale of products with long sales cycles.
  • scarface_74 2 hours ago
    Working with business people, solving XYProblems and figuring out the “what needs to be done”. Telling computers what to do has always been the easy problem for 90% of what software developers do.

    That’s why if you look at the leveling guidelines for any well known tech company, “codez real gud” only makes a difference between junior and mid level developers. After that it’s about “scope”, “impact” and “dealing with ambiguity”.

    Yes I realize that there are still some “hard problems” that command a premium for people to be able to solve via code - that’s the other 10% and I’m being generous.